Built the app with AI. Get it working reliably.
Your prototype runs, but a login fails, a payment goes missing or every new prompt breaks something else. We review the affected code and workflows, agree what needs fixing, then deliver the engineering work that gets your app moving again. Keep what works; change what does not.
A working demo is not the whole product.
The difficult part often starts where features meet: a payment changes access, an invitation grants a role, or a background job finishes after the browser closes. We trace those connections before recommending a fix. A rescue is not automatically a rewrite, a migration or a security audit. The first decision is which intervention your app actually needs.
What you get.
A developer-led diagnosis
We reproduce the reported failure in an agreed environment, inspect the relevant implementation and separate symptoms from causes. Share the failing journey, expected behaviour and recent changes. We agree whether a paid diagnostic stage is needed before promising an implementation scope.
A repair plan you can understand
You receive a prioritized scope explaining what to preserve, what to repair and what may need redesign. We call out dependencies, exclusions and decisions you need to make. Fixing an integration may require provider access or a change to the product rules, not just another prompt.
Authentication and permission fixes
We work on sign-in, account recovery, invitations, staff roles and customer access where they are in scope. Tests include the intended user and an account that should be denied. Do not send passwords, live tokens or customer exports through the quote form.
Payments and integration repair
We trace checkout, subscription state, webhooks, email and external API calls as connected workflows. Test-mode providers and harmless fixtures let us check retries and failures without charging customers or sending real messages.
A release that can be checked
Agreed changes include relevant regression checks and a release plan. We identify how to observe the result and recover if the release fails. A source-code revert alone does not undo a database change or an external payment.
A usable handover
We document what changed, how to run the relevant checks and which limitations remain. Continued feature work or an independent security audit can be scoped separately. You keep control of your accounts and code.
How it works.
- 01
Show us the blocked journey
Describe the platform, the feature that fails and what you expected. A short reproduction or sanitized screenshot helps more than a list of error messages without context.
- 02
Agree the smallest useful scope
We review the relevant code and dependencies. You get a written scope and quote, or a scoped diagnostic proposal where uncertainty prevents an honest fixed implementation quote.
- 03
Repair and verify
We implement the agreed changes and exercise normal, rejected and failure paths. Larger jobs can be split into milestones so urgent blockers are separated from optional improvements.
- 04
Release and hand over
Deployment responsibilities, data changes and post-release checks are agreed before the switch. We explain remaining risks rather than calling the whole application secure because one feature is fixed.
Common questions.
- Which AI tools can you help with?
- We work with applications built using Lovable, Base44, Replit, Bolt, v0 and coding assistants such as Cursor, Claude Code and Codex. The scope follows the actual code, backend and integrations, not just the tool's name.
- Will you rebuild everything?
- Only if the evidence and requirements justify it. A targeted repair, refactor or migration may preserve much of the existing work. We explain the tradeoffs before committing to a route.
- Do I need a security audit first?
- Not for every bug fix. If the app handles sensitive records, permissions or payments, a separate security review may be appropriate. A rescue engagement does not imply that every component has been audited.
- How much does AI-app rescue cost?
- It depends on the affected workflows, integrations, code quality and release constraints. We quote the agreed work rather than charging by how many prompts produced the app. Diagnostic work, implementation and optional follow-on services are identified separately.
- Can you finish an app another developer left behind?
- Yes, subject to a review of access, ownership and the current implementation. We first establish what runs, what is incomplete and whether the source and deployed system match. Avoid deleting the old deployment before that inventory is complete.
Related services and guides.
Get your app working beyond the demo.
Have a senior developer trace the failing workflow and scope the repair, integration or feature your product needs next.